I realize it's been nearly 3 decades when "pocket PCs" were on my radar with Palm and iPaqs. I had this notion that perhaps I could do all my computing on a portable device that could fit in my pocket.

I guess the modern smartphone has advanced quite a bit, but it still doesn't handle all my computing needs.

Now, upon reflection, I've strayed far from the idea of having a singular computing device.

Currently I regularly use:

-Windows gaming laptop, specifically with a discrete GPU to handle video and 3D rendering work

-Macbook Air specifically just to deploy stuff via XCode

...That Apple has a Neo and Surface does not.

...That Apple (and maybe Samsung?) might be preparing a "wide" folding cell phone while Microsoft cancelled the Duo years ago.

...That Asus has a (Zenbook) Duo...

What do you find ironic?

I've just stumbled across this YouTube channel that compares E-Ink displays.

https://youtube.com/@theinktelligent

He's not the most scientific about it, but he does just show the devices with consideration for balance (adjusting frontlights, etc.), and it's clearly not 'AI' nonsense.

Matthew Wolf, Esq., in an all too common scenario these days, has been called to answer for citations to and quotes from non-existant cases to a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas in Butler County, Pennsylvania (A/K/A God's Country or as some Pennsylvanians call it, Alabama). His firm, Wolf Dillion McCandless King Coulter & Grand, LLP (did everyone need their names in the firm letterhead?) claims that they did not use AI and the citations were proper. That should be a fairly easy lift for counsel or the courts, whoever is right. I know where my money is. Why did the judge pick this up and not Wolf's adversary? Is anybody reading the briefs anymore? Pa. judge questions AI hallucinations in gender-identity suit | 90.5 WESA