This post is from a suggested group
AI Rears its Ugly Head in Pennsylvania.
Matthew Wolf, Esq., in an all too common scenario these days, has been called to answer for citations to and quotes from non-existant cases to a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas in Butler County, Pennsylvania (A/K/A God's Country or as some Pennsylvanians call it, Alabama). His firm, Wolf Dillion McCandless King Coulter & Grand, LLP (did everyone need their names in the firm letterhead?) claims that they did not use AI and the citations were proper. That should be a fairly easy lift for counsel or the courts, whoever is right. I know where my money is. Why did the judge pick this up and not Wolf's adversary? Is anybody reading the briefs anymore? Pa. judge questions AI hallucinations in gender-identity suit | 90.5 WESA



wake me when they figure out a way to emulate drivers.