Matthew Wolf, Esq., in an all too common scenario these days, has been called to answer for citations to and quotes from non-existant cases to a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas in Butler County, Pennsylvania (A/K/A God's Country or as some Pennsylvanians call it, Alabama). His firm, Wolf Dillion McCandless King Coulter & Grand, LLP (did everyone need their names in the firm letterhead?) claims that they did not use AI and the citations were proper. That should be a fairly easy lift for counsel or the courts, whoever is right. I know where my money is. Why did the judge pick this up and not Wolf's adversary? Is anybody reading the briefs anymore? Pa. judge questions AI hallucinations in gender-identity suit | 90.5 WESA